 |  |
        |
 THE IMMUNITY CHALLENGE
Absurd - Of, relating to, or manifesting that there is no order
or meaning in human life or in the universe. Of or to absurdism. The
condition or state in which humans exist in an absurd universe, without
meaning or purpose. College for some is just that, the immunity
challenge in life which results in the graduate thinking they can no
longer say, do, or be considered stupid. Such pursuits and endeavors
are a futile effort 'cause after all they paid good money to have
professors teach these things to them, but in the end everything they
know, has been discovered on their own with the aid of a textbook. As
the professors say "we are not going to spoon-feed this stuff to you".
So what are the professors there for exactly? To inform us what to know
perhaps, so we can come to the same conclusion as they did. - AbsurdPosted 4/2025 by MIKEY BREWER |
 THE SPIRITUAL CREEP TOWARDS WORLD GOVERNMENT Posted 3/2025 by Howard C. Dugan The concept of a New World Order (NWO) has been a subject of fascination and concern for many. One of the key areas that draws attention is the subtle and spiritual dimension of this so-called global governance agenda. Non-governmental organizations (NGOs), particularly those with esoteric or spiritual orientations, play a crucial role in shaping the ideology that drives the globalist movement. One such organization is the Lucis Trust, a body with profound connections to both the United Nations and broader spiritual movements. Lucis Trust is an organization with roots in the theosophical movement, a spiritual tradition that emphasizes mystical knowledge and spiritual evolution. The trust was originally established in 1922 as the Lucifer Publishing Company by Alice A. Bailey and her husband Foster Bailey, but later changed its name to Lucis Trust due to the controversial nature of its original title. The connection to "Lucifer" evokes many different interpretations, ranging from an allegorical "light-bringer" to more nefarious connotations, which have fueled conspiracies surrounding the organization's true intent. Alice Bailey's Writings form the bedrock of Lucis Trust's philosophy. Bailey, a prolific writer on spiritual subjects, published 24 books that elaborate on a wide range of esoteric topics, including the Seven Rays, spiritual hierarchy, and the Great Plan for humanity's evolution. Central to Bailey's work is the belief in a spiritual hierarchy of ascended masters guiding human evolution towards the establishment of a more enlightened, united world - concepts that resonate with the vision of global governance often associated with the NWO. Bailey's ideas strongly influence Lucis Trust's mission and outreach. One of the most striking aspects of Lucis Trust is its consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC). This raises the question: What role does spirituality play in international governance? Lucis Trust operates through its various branches, including World Goodwill, an NGO that promotes global cooperation based on spiritual principles. World Goodwill is closely aligned with the UN's agenda, promoting ideas like sustainable development and international cooperation under the guise of spirituality. Many view this relationship as more than just a partnership - it represents a merging of spiritual and political forces, where a particular spiritual ideology influences the direction of global governance. Lucis Trust advocates for the "Plan", a spiritual framework for the future of humanity. While the details of this Plan are framed as a benevolent roadmap towards enlightenment and peace, critics argue that it aligns disturbingly with the goals of the NWO - a centralized world government with control over social, economic, and even spiritual aspects of life. Is the Lucis Trust's involvement with the UN a sign that there is a spiritual foundation underpinning the quest for global governance? World Goodwill is particularly significant because it frames its mission as promoting goodwill on a global scale, fostering right human relations, and supporting the UN's peace and development goals. However, it also subtly advocates for the spiritual evolution of humanity, which it suggests is key to solving global issues. By linking the need for spiritual awakening with political cooperation, World Goodwill blurs the line between religious or spiritual transformation and political reform. The fact that Lucis Trust and its affiliated organizations advocate for this "spiritual awakening" under the auspices of international cooperation raises concerns for those wary of any form of globalism. Many interpret this as an attempt to introduce a form of spiritual authority that complements and strengthens the global political order - a kind of spiritual side to the NWO that aims to unify humanity not just politically, but spiritually under a common banner. The Theosophical Society, which profoundly influenced Alice Bailey, holds at its core the idea that there is a divine plan guiding human evolution. Bailey's work expands on this by arguing that humanity is in the midst of an evolutionary shift, where enlightened souls will lead the way toward a new era. Her vision includes a New Age in which humanity will embrace a one-world government and religion, guided by spiritual leaders who understand this divine plan. Many view this as a blueprint for the spiritual component of the New World Order, where political and economic systems are merely tools in the hands of those who are spiritually evolved enough to wield them. The connection between Bailey's work and the activities of Lucis Trust, combined with the Trust's involvement with the UN, suggests that there may be a coordinated effort to introduce these ideas into the fabric of global governance. The adoption of the Lucis Trust by globalist circles, particularly its involvement with the United Nations, raises serious questions about the agenda behind the spiritual framework it promotes. Critics argue that there is a concerted effort to push humanity toward a centralized world government, not just through political and economic means, but through spiritual manipulation. By presenting their ideology as enlightened and benevolent, Lucis Trust and similar organizations may be able to advance their agenda more easily - subtly encouraging a world where individual sovereignty is replaced by collective, global governance guided by a select spiritual elite. In conclusion, while Lucis Trust frames its mission as one of spiritual enlightenment and global cooperation, the connections to global governance structures like the United Nations and the underlying theosophical framework raise concerns about a creeping form of spiritual authority over global affairs. Could this be the spiritual side of the NWO's divine plan for humanity? Only time will tell, but the growing influence of such organizations on the global stage suggests that this is a topic that warrants careful attention and scrutiny. |
 WHEN MASCULINITY IS CHALLENGED Posted 2/2025 by Antonio Curtis A male who has been emasculated fights that much harder than someone comfortable in their sexuality. This sentiment captures a deep-rooted psychological phenomenon, wherein individuals who feel their sense of masculinity or self-worth has been threatened often respond with a stronger, more assertive form of behavior. We all saw Brokeback Mountain didn't we? In this context, we can examine figures like Caitlyn Jenner (formerly known as Bruce Jenner) and in his fight to prove his masculinity won several gold medals only ending in the process of finding his real identity... The so-called "Gay Bomb" was a concept allegedly considered by the military in the mid-1990s as a non-lethal weapon. It was designed to release pheromones that might cause enemy soldiers to become more attracted to each other, thus disrupting their ability to fight effectively. While the concept never materialized into a viable weapon, it serves as a symbolic metaphor in the context of this discussion. The notion of deploying such a weapon taps into deeply held fears around sexuality and masculinity. The suggestion that making enemy soldiers question their masculinity or heterosexuality could weaken their resolve, the fear of losing one's identity as a "real man." The fact that using such a weapon might have led to "2 billion Muslims trying to prove that they are in-fact not gay" fighting with that much more resolve, where proving one's heterosexuality and masculinity could ultimately lead to a victory for the these hypothetically gay Muslims. Today, many see a shift in gender dynamics, where traditional boundaries are increasingly blurred. The concept that "males are becoming more like women and the women are becoming more like men" captures a sentiment often voiced in discussions about changing gender roles. It reflects a perception that men are embracing more traditionally feminine traits, while women are stepping into roles historically occupied by men, such as positions of power, leadership, and assertiveness. This evolution is seen by some as a positive expansion of what it means to be human, allowing people to express themselves more freely without being confined to traditional gender norms. Others, however, perceive it as a threat to the stability of long-held social structures. This perspective suggests that as gender roles become more fluid, a sense of disorientation sets in, leading some to hold on more tightly to traditional definitions of masculinity and femininity. In the end, the suggestion that "this is a war that we will all lose" points to the futility of resisting the tide of change. Society's views on gender and identity are shifting, driven by increased visibility and acceptance of LGBTQ+ individuals, as well as a broader questioning of what it means to be masculine or feminine. As these changes unfold, even those who might fight hardest to hold onto traditional roles may find themselves adapting, whether willingly or not. "PERHAPS THE BOMB WAS DROPPED ON US INSTEAD?," as this society may be experiencing a slow but profound shift in how gender and sexuality are understood - one that feels as disruptive as any military weapon. This metaphorical "bomb" represents cultural forces like the media, social movements, and evolving social norms, which have dramatically altered the landscape of gender and identity over the past few decades. Just as Caitlyn Jenner challenges our understanding of gender, and as societal norms continue to evolve, it becomes increasingly clear that the lines between "male" and "female," "strong" and "weak," are not as rigid as they once seemed. The "war" over gender and identity may be one that we all lose if we see it as a battle against each other... |
 TO END RELIGION
It was once said that conquering Megiddo was like conquering a thousand
cities. Megiddo, situated in the heart of the Jezreel Valley, is a
place soaked in history, prophecy, and bloodshed. For centuries, it has
been a symbol of decisive battles and divine reckoning. It is there,
the texts predict, that the ultimate clash of civilizations will take
place - a final showdown between Muslims, Christians, and Jews. But
what if this foreseen confrontation is not a divine inevitability but
rather a carefully orchestrated plan? A plan designed not for salvation
but for annihilation - not by God, but by those who would play god.Posted 01/2025 by Howard C. Dugan The stage is set. The world's major religions, each claiming dominion over truth, are nudged closer to conflict by unseen hands. The goal is not the victory of one faith over another but the destruction of all faiths. Why? To pave the way for a new world, one devoid of religion - a sanitized, secular utopia crafted in the image of its architects. The architects of this plan are not prophets or saints but elites wielding unparalleled influence. Their vision is clear: to unite humanity under a one-world government, promising an end to war, poverty, and suffering. But this promise comes at a steep price. To achieve this vision, they require humanity to forfeit its greatest bastion of hope and identity: religion. In its place, they offer a Medical Technocracy - a system where human well-being is measured, monitored, and controlled through technology and science. This new order demands more than just obedience; it demands belief. The elites seek to replace the gods of scripture with gods of their own making. These new deities are not supernatural beings but the leaders of this technocracy, elevated to divine status through their control over life itself. In this paradigm, faith is no longer directed toward the heavens but toward the laboratories and boardrooms where humanity's future is designed. The strategy is one of checkmate - a series of calculated moves designed to corner humanity into submission. Consider the following steps: 1. Instigate Global Conflict: By stoking the fires of religious and cultural divides, they create chaos that seems to validate the futility of traditional belief systems. 2. Offer a Solution: Amidst the chaos, they present the one-world government as the only viable path to peace and stability. 3. Dismantle Religious Institutions: Through propaganda, legal restrictions, and social engineering, they erode the credibility and power of religious authorities. 4. Introduce the Technocracy: With the promise of eradicating disease, poverty, and inequality, they lure humanity into embracing technological governance. Each step tightens the noose around humanity's spiritual freedom, leaving little room for dissent. The ultimate goal is not merely the cessation of war but the transformation of human identity itself. In this new world, there is no room for God because the elites have claimed that space for themselves. In the end, the question remains: How can one put such a heavy price on peace? For centuries, humanity has sought to end conflict, to create a world where swords are beaten into plowshares. But at what cost? In a world where peace is for sale but no one is buying, the elites offer a Faustian bargain. They promise an end to war, but only if we agree to surrender our souls. The truth is that peace cannot be imposed; it must be cultivated. A world united by coercion is no utopia; it is a prison... |
Copyright Disclaimer